Should you manage work in progress in agency teams?

a neon sign that says actually doing the things

How many complex things can a human do at the same time?

It’s not a trick question. The answer likely came to you immediately. Correct, it’s one.

Doing more than one complex thing at the same time leads to terrible outcomes. Take driving and using a mobile phone as the extreme example.

In product teams — who often focus on a single goal for many weeks at a time — there are strict limits on work in progress. A person can be assigned to only one thing. Teams work on one thing per team member, minus one thing to ensure redundancy.

In agencies these rules are often less clearly defined, and sometimes don’t exist. People are commonly multi-assigned. They could be spending time across two or more projects, while also covering support agreement work.

It’s not uncommon for me to see people assigned to ten or more tickets. Yes 1-0, ten.

Continue reading

Thoughts on the sales process

How often is there a mismatch between sales and delivery?

How often do we deliver something fundamentally different from what we thought was agreed with a client?

It’s rare for the sales process to include much time from the delivery team. It inflates the cost of sales, and unsuccessful pitches feel significantly more risky. So is it worth it?

Is it worth it?

For me, absolutely. Sales teams aren’t always able to consider the risk that’s baked into the projects they sell without experienced members of delivery. There has to be a better approach that isn’t many times more expensive.

I see this reduction of project risk, and the multiplying effect on team and client engagement as an investment in the future. An acknowledgment that project failure and client churn is significantly more expensive than bringing forward discussions about project delivery. Even if some projects never happen.

What would this early involvement look like?

Start with the ‘why’. Why now, why this, what will success look like and how will we measure it?

Continue reading

Thoughts on stand-ups

Stand-ups are used by most creative and digital agencies. Teams have daily meetings where they align around their progress, challenges and discuss what’s coming next.

At least 15 minutes a day is spent on those calls. The whole team attends. Listening is the primary activity for attendees. It shouldn’t be controversial to state that the time should be used wisely.

But what does wisely mean? Well for me it means that it’s a good use of time for all who attend. From the most experienced to the least experienced team member. No matter what the role. Everyone should walk away believing they benefited from the call.

The focus of these stand-ups however is all too often a turn taking exercise where an individual’s status is shared. They read out information that is stored in accessible digital tools that the team can access.

What if stand-ups were about planning instead of reporting?

Continue reading

Three hours to trialling new ways of working

The premise of all my work is impact. Agencies look to me for swift solutions to urgent problems. There is rarely time available to building rapport with a team. I have to build trust rapidly as I go.

And that’s not a simple challenge. The approach isn’t possible without a minimal level of trust, but I’ve yet to justify specific time for trust building.

How quickly can I get from meeting a team for the first time, to having their commitment to experiments aimed at improving shared ways of working?

It’s been an interesting challenge finding out.

I’ve used a similar approach a few times now when meeting a new team. I’m putting it out in the world as another opportunity to review it for potential improvements, and to open it up to feedback from those who have relevant experiences and insights.

Continue reading